AllCoreDevs - Testing #077
Transcript
- FLCL
gm
- jochem-brouwer
gm gm :)
- wolovim
gm
- Justin Traglia
Gm
- Stefan Starflinger
gm
- Enrico Del Fante (tbenr)
gm
- Eitan Seri-Levi
gm
- David (dionysuz)
gm
- Yassine Ferhane
gm
- Potuz
gm
- Justin Florentine (Besu)
omg is this gonna be a Pari episode?!?!?!
- Justin Traglia
Reacted to "omg is this gonna be..." with ❤️
- Barnabas
Reacted to "omg is this gonna be..." with ❤️
- Enrico Del Fante (tbenr)
Reacted to "omg is this gonna be..." with ❤️
- Toni Wahrstätter
Reacted to "omg is this gonna be..." with ❤️
- Parithosh Jayanthi
Reacted to "omg is this gonna be a Pari episode?!?!?!" with ❤️
- Barnabas
Replying to "omg is this gonna be..." he never gets this excited when I host the call
- Mario Vega
Reacted to "omg is this gonna be..." with ❤️
- jochem-brouwer
Heeft gereageerd op "omg is this gonna ..." met ❤️
- Potuz
crap I can't hear anything, anyuone speaking?
- Justin Traglia
Reacted to "he never gets this e..." with 😅
- Parithosh Jayanthi
Reacted to "he never gets this excited when I host the call" with ❤️
- Toni Wahrstätter
Reacted to "he never gets this e..." with ❤️
- Enrico Del Fante (tbenr)
Reacted to "he never gets this e..." with 😬
- Mario Vega
Reacted to "he never gets this e..." with ❤️
- wolovim
Reacted to "he never gets this e..." with ❤️
- Enrico Del Fante (tbenr)
Replying to "crap I can't hear an..." Yes they are speaking
- Łukasz Rozmej
Reacted to "omg is this gonna be..." with ❤️
- Stefan Starflinger
- Stefan Starflinger
- spencer
- Ben Adams
Replying to "https://notes.ethere..." I'd like to add 2780 to devnet4 since it effects every tx would be good to get sight of it soon
- FLCL
any takes on devnet-4 date?
- Mario Vega
What’s the number of the EIP?
- Toni Wahrstätter
2780 is still waiting for the benchmarks anyway?
- Stefan Starflinger
2780
- Mario Vega
Reacted to "2780" with 👍🏼
- FLCL
https://notes.ethereum.org/@ethpandaops/bal-devnet-4 changed and mentions other two gas changes instead of 2780. Honestly solid and stable 8037 may be enough for 4. 3 repricing eips is too much on top of it. Or include 1 something simple
- Stefan Starflinger
if we were done (end in sight) with 8037 i'd be behind adding 2780
- Barnabas
Would prefer stability over adding another EIP. (for interop’s sake)
- jochem-brouwer
Heeft gereageerd op "Would prefer stabi..." met ➕
- FLCL
Reacted to "Would prefer stabili..." with ➕
- spencer
Reacted to "Would prefer stabi..." with ➕
- Parithosh Jayanthi
Reacted to "Would prefer stability over adding another EIP. (for interop’s sake)" with ➕
- Stefan Starflinger
- Stefan Starflinger
Reacted to "https://notes.ethere..." with 👍
- emma (reth)
Reacted to "Would prefer stabili..." with ➕
- Mario Vega
- Mario Vega
Replying to "EIP-7976 and EIP-798..." The changes are simple in the tests too afaik
- Toni Wahrstätter
EIP-7976 (specs and tests): https://github.com/ethereum/execution-specs/pull/2115 EIP-7981 (specs and tests): https://github.com/ethereum/execution-specs/pull/2144
- spencer
Reacted to "EIP-7976 (specs): ..." with 🔥
- Barnabas
Reacted to "EIP-7976 (specs): ht..." with 🔥
- Rafael Matias (skylenet)
Reacted to "EIP-7976 (specs): ..." with 🔥
- jochem-brouwer
Heeft gereageerd op "EIP-7976 (specs): ..." met 🔥
- felix (eest)
Reacted to "EIP-7976 (specs): ..." with 🔥
- Stefan Starflinger
How do I get into the breakout room again :D
- Mario Vega
Reacted to "EIP-7976 (specs and ..." with 🔥
- Stefan Starflinger
Reacted to "EIP-7976 (specs and ..." with 🔥
- Luis Pinto | Besu
Reacted to "EIP-7976 (specs and tests): https://github.com/ethereum/execution-specs/pull/2115 EIP-7981 (specs and tests): https://github.com/ethereum/execution-specs/pull/2144" with 🔥
- Toni Wahrstätter
Replying to "How do I get into th..." i think there'll be a popup
- Łukasz Rozmej
what does that mean?
- Justin Traglia
Reacted to "i think there'll be ..." with 👍
- Toni Wahrstätter
- spencer
Reacted to "Screenshot2026_04_..." with 😂
- Justin Traglia
Reacted to "Screenshot2026_04_13_161748.jpg" with 😂
- Stefan Starflinger
Reacted to "Barnabas has sent yo..." with 😂
- felix (eest)
Reacted to "Screenshot2026_04_..." with 😂
- pk910
Reacted to "Barnabas has sent yo..." with 😂
- Toni Wahrstätter
Reacted to "Barnabas has sent yo..." with 😂
- jochem-brouwer
Heeft gereageerd op "Screenshot2026_04_..." met 😂
- Dmitrii Shmatko
Reacted to "Screenshot2026_04_13_161748.jpg" with 😂
- raxhvl
Reacted to "Barnabas has sent yo..." with 😂
- Enrico Del Fante (tbenr)
Reacted to "Screenshot2026_04_13_161748.jpg" with 😂
- Parithosh Jayanthi
Reacted to "Screenshot2026_04_13_161748.jpg" with 😂
- Nico Flaig
Reacted to "Barnabas has sent yo..." with 😂
- Bharath
Reacted to "i think there'll be ..." with 👍
- Mario Vega
Reacted to "Screenshot2026_04_13_161748.jpg" with 😂
- FLCL
at least one finalized block?
- Parithosh Jayanthi
Wouldn’t this depend on snap vs full sync?
- Justin Florentine (Besu)
yes, i think we would backwards sync right over the unfinalized section.
- Toni Wahrstätter
For at least the WSP yeah
- Barnabas
who is responsible for reorging in case we have a massive parallel fork?
- Toni Wahrstätter
There is a fallback to snap sync in case the state of the parent is missing though - not sure this can be triggered for the scenarion in discussion
- FLCL
why is it significant?
- Łukasz Rozmej
"I want to have that in writing" ;)
- Potuz
I’ll have a quick writeup soon
- Justin Traglia
Reacted to "I’ll have a quick wr..." with ❤️
- jochem-brouwer
Heeft gereageerd op "I’ll have a quick..." met ❤️
- Stefan Starflinger
Reacted to "I’ll have a quick wr..." with ❤️
- Justin Florentine (Besu)
i remain unsure but writeup can be consulted by rest of team, pretty quickly
- Toni Wahrstätter
Reacted to "I’ll have a quick wr..." with ❤️
- Łukasz Rozmej
@Potuz how is it different from initial sync? In initial sync you also give us Payload/FCU and we get it from the network
- Enrico Del Fante (tbenr)
I get it now what the issue is 🙂
- nixo
marc
- Potuz
When we do init sync we do send you the payloads
- Potuz
LH doesn't
- Potuz
But they verify the hash
- wolovim
Thanks 🙂
- Potuz
Am I the only one that doesn’t see a breakout?
- lightclient
I dont
- nixo
i don’t either
- Potuz
Can you add me Pari to the ePBS one?
- Eitan Seri-Levi
I can’t see it
- Eitan Seri-Levi
CL breakout pls
- nixo
EL
- lightclient
EL
- wolovim
Menu bar: More > Breakout Rooms
Call summary
Targets
- •April 29th - Latest BalDevNet 4 launch (prefer before interop) - 00:15:21
Decisions
- •Prefer stability over adding EIP-2780 to BalDevNet 4 before interop - 00:19:47
- •Include EIP-7976 and EIP-7981 in BalDevNet 4 (simple data EIPs) - 00:21:28
- •Re-evaluate EIP-2780 inclusion next Monday after test/implementation assessment - 00:19:32
Highlights
- Devnet Status:
- ·ePBS DevNet 1 broken since launch; DevNet 2 planned after beacon state changes - 00:08:31
- ·BalDevNet 3 launched Wednesday; Geth/Nethermind forked on gas accounting disagreement - 00:09:12
- ·State gas reservoir overflow: clients disagree treating borrowed gas as state vs regular - 00:09:53
- Epbs Technical:
- ·Proposed: EPBS range sync without requesting payloads for finalized sections - 00:22:54
- ·Removing payload state transition enables CL-only range sync; much faster catchup - 00:24:40
- ·Risk: could client sync through finalized invalid block without payload validation? - 00:26:12
- ·Nethermind validates by replaying all blocks from network during range sync - 00:29:32
- Bal Devnet Planning:
- ·BalDevNet 4 spec created; 2-3 issues for DevNet 3, remainder require DevNet 4 - 00:11:17
- ·Points 3-6 in design doc need discussion; current spec may not be final - 00:13:27
- ·EIP-7976 and EIP-7981 proposed for BalDevNet 4 - 00:14:24
- ·EIP-2780 (transaction base cost breakdown) proposed; affects every transaction - 00:14:50
Action Items
- •EL teams - Discuss EIP-8037 clarifications in breakout room - 00:10:54
- •Potuz - Write up EPBS range sync proposal for EL team review - 00:34:30
- •EL teams - Review range sync security implications async - 00:35:19